By Abdo I. and James J. Heaphey, eds. Baaklini
Read Online or Download Comparative Legislative Reforms and Innovations PDF
Best comparative books
An exam of the way, why and the place corruption mars judicial methods.
The point of interest of this publication, the criminal scenario created while an agent acts with out authority, is likely one of the most crucial concerns in employer legislation. The research is split into 3 sections: obvious authority, ratification and the legal responsibility of the falsus procurator. Adopting a distinct comparative point of view, the contributions are drawn from many alternative felony platforms, offering the chance for research of the ecu universal law/civil legislation divide.
- Gender and Development: The Japanese Experience in Comparative Perspective
- The Living Prism: Itineraries in Comparative Literature
- Property in the Margins
- The Comparative Anatomy of Neurons: Homologous Neurons in the Medial Geniculate Body of the Opossum and the Cat
Additional info for Comparative Legislative Reforms and Innovations
For the past five years the Comparative Development Studies Center has sponsored three international conferences on legislative development and has organized several panels on the same topics in the context of the annual conferences of the American Society for Public Administration, Society for International Development, and the triennial meeting of the International Political Science Association. The first international conference sponsored by the Center took place in Cyprus in 1972 and resulted in the establishment of the Research Committee on Legislative Development of the International Political Science Association.
On the other hand, such an absence may be conceived as a disadvantage, since it can lead many of those who are involved and interested in legislative reforms to believe that public administration has sold out to the politically influential legislators who are at the base of legislative weakness and corruption. The question becomes, then, how can public administration maintain its theoretical consistency and yet demonstrate its utility? In view of the growth of public bureaucracies in the executive branch, and the power they have come to wield, it would be naive to accept the thesis that bureaucracies are simply tools for the advancement of rational-legal decision-making.
The politics-administration dichotomy was challenged and efficiency and rationality were reexamined. The new perspective revealed that public administration was engaged in policy-making and that efficiency and rationality had become ends in themselves rather than means. As before, proponents of a strong bureaucracy argued that the difference between bureaucracy in a democracy and bureaucracy in a dictatorship is in the primacy given to politics. In a democracy bureaucracies do engage in political choices but they are ultimately controlled by political institutions.