Rethinking corporate governance : the law and economics of by Alessio Pacces

By Alessio Pacces

The normal method of the criminal foundations of company governance is predicated at the view that company legislation promotes separation of possession and regulate through retaining non-controlling shareholders from expropriation. This booklet takes a broader viewpoint through exhibiting that investor safeguard is an important, yet no longer adequate, criminal situation for the effective separation of possession and keep an eye on. aiding the regulate powers of managers or controlling shareholders is as vital as keeping traders from the abuse of those powers.

Rethinking company Governance reappraises the prevailing framework for the industrial research of company legislations according to 3 different types of personal merits of regulate. a few of these advantages should not inevitably undesirable for company governance. The components of legislation in most cases affecting deepest advantages of keep an eye on – together with the distribution of company powers, self-dealing, and takeover rules – are analyzed in 5 jurisdictions, particularly the united states, the united kingdom, Italy, Sweden, and the Netherlands. not just does this method of company legislation clarify separation of possession and regulate higher than simply investor defense; it additionally means that the legislation can enhance the potency of company governance by way of permitting non-controlling shareholders to be much less powerful.

Show description

Read or Download Rethinking corporate governance : the law and economics of control powers PDF

Best comparative books

Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems

An exam of ways, why and the place corruption mars judicial tactics.

The Unauthorised Agent: Perspectives from European and Comparative Law

The focal point of this ebook, the criminal state of affairs created whilst an agent acts with no authority, is among the most crucial matters in organisation legislations. The research is split into 3 sections: obvious authority, ratification and the legal responsibility of the falsus procurator. Adopting a distinct comparative point of view, the contributions are drawn from many various criminal platforms, supplying the chance for research of the eu universal law/civil legislation divide.

Additional info for Rethinking corporate governance : the law and economics of control powers

Example text

The conventional approach to corporate governance deals more with how this discretion is constrained than with how it is exercised. According to the mainstream economic theory of corporate governance, the special feature of management compared to the other constituencies of the corporate enterprise is their direct accountability 1 This chapter summarizes chapters 1–4 of Pacces (2007), where the theoretical, the empirical and the law and finance literature on corporate governance are discussed in greater detail (and many more references can be found).

If anything, the thesis that control matters and so does its legal protection is even reinforced by the revealed unreliability of financial markets in assessing performance in the short run. But apart from this very general observation, the welfare analysis of this book is much too narrow to allow the integration of the problem of financial stability in the study of the governance of a very peculiar kind of firm, like banks and comparable financial institutions. 1 Separation of ownership and control Economic theory of corporate governance approaches separation of ownership and control as a problem of separation of firm management from firm finance.

Shareholders are the firm’s owners and, therefore, the residual claimants on the firm’s assets. However, lacking both coordination and the necessary expertise, they do not know how to manage them in such a way as to maximize their value as an open-ended stream of profits. Managers are in charge of managing those assets, although they are not residual claimants unless to a limited extent. Either they lack the funds to own the firm’s assets altogether or they simply do not want to commit a too large portion of their wealth to the company’s affairs.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.20 of 5 – based on 33 votes